tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1017949377944303656.post8888563774498826378..comments2010-01-29T17:01:47.120ZCalvin L. Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06688347236557235062noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1017949377944303656.post-26805584945253133882010-01-29T17:01:47.120Z2010-01-29T17:01:47.120ZWe should be careful about dismissing climate change altogether. A bit more realism is now entering the science debate thankfully. As the Government&#39;s chief scientist has now made some comments I feel free to blog about what he said at<br />http://science-and-values.blogspot.com/<br /><br />A very interesting article mind, but a CiF blog item that was pro Intelligent Design had 1669 responses. <br />http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/dec/01/evolution-curriculum-intelligent-design-school<br />Andrew SibleyDissentershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13052264110134848970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1017949377944303656.post-54851074462505353212010-01-29T16:13:27.324Z2010-01-29T16:13:27.324ZI&#39;m not surprised this provoked the largest number of responses on the newspaper&#39;s website for this type of article.<br /><br />It is very succinct. He says an awful lot, very clearly &amp; authoritively in a short punchy space.<br /><br />Bloomin&#39; shame he had to mention climate change &amp; Science :)Stuarthttp://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/noreply@blogger.com